<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bluegrass Business Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Wise counsel that is good for the bottom line</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on One-sided contracts are a bad deal for ALL parties (or getting greedy will get ya&#8217;) by Buyer beware, &#171; Missing the the point?</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/one-sided-contracts-are-a-bad-deal-for-all-parties-or-getting-greedy-will-get-ya/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Buyer beware, &#171; Missing the the point?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-468</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Despite precedents that show that contracts substantially favoring the party with the greater power often are deemed unconscionable (so unfair as to not be enforceable), lawyers stiff draft them and companies still like them.   Lesson learned: Make deals that are balanced; contracts that distribute risks and responsibilities fairly. Such deals will be honored by courts and your businesses wealth and reputation will benefit over the long term. &#8220; http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/one-sided-contracts-are-a-bad-deal-for-all-parties-or-g... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Despite precedents that show that contracts substantially favoring the party with the greater power often are deemed unconscionable (so unfair as to not be enforceable), lawyers stiff draft them and companies still like them.   Lesson learned: Make deals that are balanced; contracts that distribute risks and responsibilities fairly. Such deals will be honored by courts and your businesses wealth and reputation will benefit over the long term. &#8220; <a href="http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/one-sided-contracts-are-a-bad-deal-for-all-parties-or-g.." rel="nofollow">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/one-sided-contracts-are-a-bad-deal-for-all-parties-or-g..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One-sided contracts are a bad deal for ALL parties (or getting greedy will get ya&#8217;) by thenonconformer</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/one-sided-contracts-are-a-bad-deal-for-all-parties-or-getting-greedy-will-get-ya/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>thenonconformer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-467</guid>
		<description>I have a civil engineering degree, Concordia University , Montreal 1968, and I had worked as a Remax Realtor in Calgary too but the existing laws clearly did not stop many Realtors or even now Bell Sympatico from telling lies to the customers.

http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a civil engineering degree, Concordia University , Montreal 1968, and I had worked as a Remax Realtor in Calgary too but the existing laws clearly did not stop many Realtors or even now Bell Sympatico from telling lies to the customers.</p>
<p><a href="http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/" rel="nofollow">http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One-sided contracts are a bad deal for ALL parties (or getting greedy will get ya&#8217;) by One-sided contracts are a bad deal for ALL parties (or getting &#8230; &#124; Pisos Deal Quiler</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/one-sided-contracts-are-a-bad-deal-for-all-parties-or-getting-greedy-will-get-ya/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>One-sided contracts are a bad deal for ALL parties (or getting &#8230; &#124; Pisos Deal Quiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-460</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Court of Appeals just released a decision that shows that getting greedy will get ya’ in the end. Despite precedents that show that contracts substantially favoring the party with the greater power often are deemed unconscionable &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Court of Appeals just released a decision that shows that getting greedy will get ya’ in the end. Despite precedents that show that contracts substantially favoring the party with the greater power often are deemed unconscionable &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact us by Jim Crow Laws Employment Law Us Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/contact-us/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Crow Laws Employment Law Us Supreme Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/contact-us/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jim Crow Laws Employment Law Us Supreme Court&lt;/strong&gt;

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jim Crow Laws Employment Law Us Supreme Court</strong></p>
<p>I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arbitration provisions: if you have to sneak it in, it probably is not enforceable by Arbitration by trusted independent agencies?! &#171; Elusive Justice</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/arbitration-provisions-if-you-have-to-sneak-it-in-it-probably-is-not-enforceable/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Arbitration by trusted independent agencies?! &#171; Elusive Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 05:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/arbitration-provisions-if-you-have-to-sneak-it-in-it-probably-is-not-enforceable/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>[...] by elusivejustice on January 1, 2008  Here is a post by Bluegrass Business Law blog discussing enforceability of arbitration agreements. What the blogger fails to point out is that in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by elusivejustice on January 1, 2008  Here is a post by Bluegrass Business Law blog discussing enforceability of arbitration agreements. What the blogger fails to point out is that in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Victims&#8217; Rights Groups!? by Finance Congress</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2006/12/21/victims-rights-groups/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2006/12/21/victims-rights-groups/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Great resource for financial information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great resource for financial information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intentional intereference with contractual relationships: by Kentucky Law Review</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/intentional-intereference-with-contractual-relationships/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentucky Law Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 02:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/intentional-intereference-with-contractual-relationships/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another blawg hits the Bluegrass - Bluegrass Business Law Blog&lt;/strong&gt;

My internet sightings of sites found a new blawg in the Bluegrass; and the focus is business law ---- Bluegrass Business Law Blog. The blawgers behind the publication are Michael Troutman and Greg Napier with Troutman Hays, PLLC. When I say new, I mean...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another blawg hits the Bluegrass - Bluegrass Business Law Blog</strong></p>
<p>My internet sightings of sites found a new blawg in the Bluegrass; and the focus is business law &#8212;- Bluegrass Business Law Blog. The blawgers behind the publication are Michael Troutman and Greg Napier with Troutman Hays, PLLC. When I say new, I mean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intentional intereference with contractual relationships: by For business law information . . . &#171; Lexington Family Law</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/intentional-intereference-with-contractual-relationships/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>For business law information . . . &#171; Lexington Family Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/intentional-intereference-with-contractual-relationships/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] business law information . .&#160;. For business law information, be sure to check out Bluegrass Business Law [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] business law information . .&nbsp;. For business law information, be sure to check out Bluegrass Business Law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does your Lawyer see the sky falling? by Lexington Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/does-you-lawyer-see-the-sky-falling/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexington Lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 19:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/does-you-lawyer-see-the-sky-falling/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] is a post by The Greatest American Lawyer that nicely affirms what I previously wrot in this prior post . If you own a business where having in-house counsel is not cost efficient, consider finding a solo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a post by The Greatest American Lawyer that nicely affirms what I previously wrot in this prior post . If you own a business where having in-house counsel is not cost efficient, consider finding a solo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does your Lawyer see the sky falling? by Counselor/Lawyer as Asset to Business: &#171; Lexington Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/does-you-lawyer-see-the-sky-falling/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Counselor/Lawyer as Asset to Business: &#171; Lexington Lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutmanhays.wordpress.com/2007/04/29/does-you-lawyer-see-the-sky-falling/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] as Asset to&#160;Business: Here is an excellent follow-up post from G.A.L. to this prior post about lawyers, risk aversion and profit. Attorneys can be major assets to businesses big and small [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Asset to&nbsp;Business: Here is an excellent follow-up post from G.A.L. to this prior post about lawyers, risk aversion and profit. Attorneys can be major assets to businesses big and small [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
